by Paul Kashmann
With Barack Obama moving towards
his second 100 days in the Oval Office (and who knew anyone kept track of such
things) the historic presidential election of 2008, and the attendant deluge of
phone calls and emails begging for money, and TV commercials begging for your
attention and your vote, have faded blessedly into memory.
Thus
we were a bit startled when a press release came down the pike the other day
indicating Denverites would be called to the polls once again, in just a few
months, to choose among candidates and decide yea or nay (potentially) on
ballot issues demanding their verdict.
On
the first Tuesday of the eleventh month – Nov. 3, to be precise – those
honoring that most sacred right and obligation of a democratic culture will at
the very least be called to vote their preferences to fill several seats on
Denver Public Schools’ Board of Education.
Voters,
however, will not need to trouble themselves with a visit to their local
polling place this year. Denver’s Clerk and Recorder, Stephanie O’Malley, has
determined that, “With every city agency seeking ways to save money during
these tough economic times, I’ve decided that an all-mail ballot election makes
the most sense.” Under a recent change in state law, ballots will be mailed to
voters starting 22 days prior to the election, instead of the 30 days prior
requirement in force in past years.
Currently,
the only posts to be filled in November are four DPS Board slots. There are
seven seats on the Board of Education: five district seats and two at-large
positions. The 2009 election will be for three district seats and one at-large
(currently held by board member Joe Conrad). The districts up for election in
2009 are 2 (Michelle Moss), 3 (Jeannie Kaplan) and 4 (Kevin Patterson). Board
members serve for four years and their terms are staggered, so no more than
four board members are up for re-election at any time.
The
two initiatives currently headed toward the November ballot are bound together
loosely by a common thread. One is designed – in part – to protect residents
from motor vehicles driven by unlicensed illegal aliens from other countries,
and the other aims – in part – to protect locals from vehicles piloted by
aliens from another planet.
Jeff
Peckman first came to public attention in 2003 when he put forth Initiative
101, the “Safety Through Peace” Initiative, asking to “adopt an initiative
ordinance to require the city to help ensure public safety by increasing
peacefulness.” The measure, which called for government sponsored meditation
sessions and relaxing music to be played in public buildings, made its way onto
the ballot that year, but only 34 percent of voters called for its passage.
This
time, Peckman is urging voters to approve creation of an 18-member
Extraterrestrial Affairs Commission that would “ensure the health, safety and
cultural awareness of Denver residents and visitors in relation to potential
encounters or interactions with extraterrestrial intelligent beings or their
vehicles.” If this initiative garners the 3,973 valid signatures required to
make the ballot, and is passed by voters, the Commission would be funded by
“grants, gifts and donations.”
The
initiative urges the commission to obtain “relevant information about
extraterrestrial intelligent beings on Earth, inform people of the implications
of encounters with extraterrestrial beings or their vehicles,” and to “develop
protocols for peaceful and diplomatic contact with extraterrestrial beings in
the event of contact.”
Peckman said he does not see a clear
and present danger from the presence of extraterrestrials, but “there is a clear
and present need to know the full range of issues related to extraterrestrial
visitations to our planet.” He believes that while his proposed commission
would be the first of its kind in the U.S., voters are ready to consider it
seriously.
“Polls
over the past couple of decades – whether scientific or otherwise – have shown
60, 70 or 80 percent accepting that there is intelligent life out there in the
universe, that we have been visited by life from elsewhere and that the
government has been covering this up for 60 years or so. The vast majority are
comfortable with this issue.”
Peckman
believes the federal government has covered up its knowledge of
extraterrestrial visitation due to “greed, a basic need for control, and
continual support of the fossil fuel industries.” He says there is an
assumption “these extra-terrestrial vehicles are not using Exxon jet fuel,
they’re using energy from other highly advanced sources we could benefit from.
It’s well known that the military has far more advanced forms of
transportation, energy technologies and materials technologies than they are
willing to divulge. These are being developed at our expense without any
benefit to us.”
Peckman
does not expect this to unlock the vault to the government’s most highly
classified secrets. “It’s not even opening the doors to the federal X-files,”
he stated, “but engaging the population on a local level and introducing them
to information currently available in the private sector so they can draw their
own conclusions.”
Visit www.extracampaign.org for info.
A somewhat less but still controversial proposal
headed for the November ballot would make changes to Initiative 100, passed
last year, that directed Denver police to impound the vehicles of individuals
driving without licenses on city streets. Owners are required to post a $2,500
bond to release their impounded car.
Daniel Hayes sponsored Initiative 100, and is
spearheading the effort to close some “loopholes” that he feels make the
ordinance less than effective.
“We
want to make it mandatory to tow vehicles driven by unlicensed drivers, which
we failed to do last time. Denver found a loophole and found they didn’t have
to do it. They’re towing folks for political reasons at this point. They towed
a veteran’s car whose license had expired, and made a big deal out of that. In
rewriting the law, we’ve put in safeguards against that. If your license has
simply expired, and you go in and have it renewed, or if you simply didn’t have
your wallet with you when you were stopped, and can produce a valid license, you’re
exempted from the bond.”
Hayes
insists that the law was not written to harass illegal aliens, but says, “They
are one group of people that constitute about one half of the people who drive
without a license. What makes it worse, is that the state law is designed so
that if you’re a citizen, you’re treated different than if you’re illegal. They
give them a small fine and slap them on the wrist. It’s all part of rolling out
the red carpet for illegal aliens.”
City
Councilman Doug Linkhart told The Profile
that Council recently passed an amendment to the new law exempting rental car
companies, lien holders and victims of auto theft from the bond requirement.
Hayes explained that his initiative was drawn up before Council passed its
changes, and mirrors much of their effort.
Looking
into the future, local voters will have a chance to decide who should fill a
variety of state offices in November 2010. The ballot at that time will include
a number of Colorado congressional seats, as well as the posts of governor,
lieutenant governor, secretary of state and state treasurer.
Denver
residents will have to wait almost two years – until May 2011 – to shine the
light on local government. The offices of mayor, city auditor, clerk and
recorder and city council will come under scrutiny at that time. Mayor John
Hickenlooper is expected to run for a third term – the last available to him
under Denver’s term limit policy.
For
more information, call the Denver Clerk and Recorder at 311, or visit www.denvergov.org/elections. |