by Antony Hebblethwaite
The homeless “tell us they are
afraid that if they go on the 16th Street Mall even during daylight hours that
they will be put in jail,” writes Tom Luehrs,
director of the St. Francis Center in their summer 2012 newsletter.
“We tell
them that no one has been incarcerated under the ordinance yet.”
Fear must be working because Denver City
Councilwoman Judy Montero told the Health, Safety, Education & Services
committee that “we all know how effective it has been on the mall.” Prior to
the ban, the 16th Street Mall served as a well-lit and patrolled place for the
homeless to sleep between the hours of 9p.m.-7a.m.
The committee met Tues., Oct. 9, to receive
an update from the Denver Police Department and Denver’s Road Home about the
progress of the new ordinance targeting the homeless with criminal sanctions
for sleeping anywhere in the City of Denver with any
coverings or belongings other than the clothes on their body.
DPD Commander Antonio Lopez reported that
there have been no arrests made under the new Sec. 38-86.2. of
the Denver Municipal Code. Unfortunately, arrest statistics don’t tell the
whole story. This ordinance
gives the DPD unprecedented power to stop the homeless. Between June 1 and
September 30 there were 158 street checks for unauthorized camping impacting
386 members of the homeless community.
The ordinance is designed to create a
climate of fear among the homeless. When Downtown Denver Partnership President
Tamara Door testified before Denver City Council, she said consequences were
needed “for those who refuse assistance and continue to engage in behaviors
that threaten public safety and health.” Driven from the safety of the mall,
the homeless not only face greater risk of violence, but now potential
harassment from law enforcement.
“Outreach workers are seeing more people
hiding in alleys, behind bushes, and going deeper into hiding,” Luehrs writes. “We have reports from neighbors and other
citizens of people sleeping on their property, in their alleys, and behind
dumpsters where they hope not to be seen.”
This is precisely what Council-woman
Susan Shepherd feared as she challenged her colleagues about the proposed
ordinance. “People who spend a large part of their lives in fear may be
spending even more time in fear at the possibility of tangling with the law as
the result of this ordinance. They may hide or disappear to dispersed areas of
the city where we are even less likely to be able to reach them with services
– and our overall efforts may actually decline.”
Even Councilman Albus
Brooks, lead
sponsor of the ordinance acknowledges that the ban is complicating the work of
outreach workers. He told Westword recently, “Some of the folks are hiding a lot better. They are not in
sight. I think that’s the unfortunate piece about this. It’s making our
outreach workers work that much more ... to locate where people are.”
It is important to note that the “Urban
Camping” ban was not an attempt to make good public policy, but a quick
solution to serve the individual interests of Denver’s 16th Street business
community who felt the presence of the homeless downtown harmed them
economically. If it had been about addressing the underlying causes of
homelessness, Mayor Hancock and Councilman Brooks would have consulted the
Denver Homeless Commission before introducing the ordinance before City
Council.
The ordinance originated in the Downtown
Denver Partnership to supersede Sec. 38-86.1. of the
Denver Municipal Code, that provided homeless people a safe sanctuary in
downtown between the hours of 9p.m.-7a.m. The police statistics provided to
councilmembers on Oct. 9 show that the largest number of street checks for
unauthorized camping occurred in downtown (45) and along the South Platte River
(67). As the homeless could no longer sleep in the downtown area, they moved to
the South Platte River and police “sweeps” followed them there.
As ordinances criminalizing homelessness
have multiplied in the United States, experts like the National Law Center on
Homelessness & Poverty, National Coalition for the Homeless and United
States Interagency on Homelessness have provided extensive guidance to cities about
compassionate, justice-based alternatives to criminalization. Targeting the
homeless with criminal sanctions places an already vulnerable community at
greater risk and complicates efforts to help individuals find their way out of
homelessness. It also violates international human rights standards. Rhode
Island is fighting the trend and passed the nation’s first Homeless Bill of
Rights in June, which states that the homeless have
the right to be free from harassment by law enforcement.
“Where’s everybody going to go?” said James
Z., a guest at the St. Francis Center. “What do they want us to do, hide? If
they don’t want people camping, they should provide somewhere for us to live.”
The ordinance was introduced into City
Council with promises that it would help connect the homeless to shelters and
services. At the time, shelters were already at capacity and more than 2,000
individuals who are homeless and mentally ill were on the waiting list for
mental health services at the Stout Street Clinic. During the ordinance debate,
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless Director John Parvensky
told the Denver
Post, “It is even more inhumane
to make [homelessness] illegal while acknowledging that there is not sufficient
shelter or housing alternatives.”
Five months after the passage of the
ordinance, there are plans for a 24-hour shelter but the immediate shelter
situation remains unchanged. Statistics presented by Denver’s Road Home to
councilmembers put the crisis in focus. Shelter occupancy rates at Salvation
Army’s Crossroads and the Denver Rescue Mission overnight shelters have
increased from about 75 percent to 108 percent of capacity from April 2012 to
September 2012. The Delores Project for single women is consistently at full
capacity. The numbers for youth shelters were conspicuously missing from the
data. Denver’s Road Home issues motel vouchers to 70 percent of people who
request them to pick up the slack. “Despite these increases, we have no new
overnight shelters for teens, families, couples, or single men and women,”
writes Luehrs. He estimates there are at least 300
people in Denver without shelter.
With
the winter approaching, this should be of deep concern. Denver Road Home
Director Bennie Milliner made assurances that anyone who requests shelter will
be provided a bed. Councilman Brooks expects that the city will announce a new
shelter for the winter months soon.
Denver Homeless Out Loud is a coalition of
Denver residents and organizations working hand-in-hand with and for the
homeless to challenge their criminalization in our city. To learn about our
work and to watch the City Council meeting referenced in this article, visit DenverHomelessOutLoud.org. (Editor’s note: Antony Hebblethwaite is a member of DenverHomelessOutLoud.org.
Refer to denverpost.com/news/ci_21884660/services-offset-denver-camping-ban-yet-be-delivered
for further recent coverage of this issue.) |