Untitled Document
June 2013 • Online Edition
 

PROFILE ONLINE: Check out our brand new flipbook

Read more

PUBLISHER: Government of, by and for needs your voice

Read more

PEOPLE: Samson’s voice familiar to classical music fans

Read more

SPILLS: Catch your breath before the kids run you ragged

Read more

LETTERS: Progress in the park; rethinking the Bill of Rights

Read more

4TH OF JULY FUN: Pancakes, pyrotechnics and parades rule the day

Read more

Letters To The Editor | Print |  E-mail
Park Bridge Demo: Nothing’s No Better

Mayor Hancock:

Attached is a photo taken from McWilliams Park in south Denver. Some six weeks ago, the bridge was removed, thankfully, after years of neglect, but in its place we have ... nothing!

 

Park neighbors are obligated to cross the waterway at Harvard Gulch at their own risk. Not only is this a needless safety hazard for young children and the elderly, but it is hardly in compliance with ADA directives. In addition to a missing  bridge, it should be pointed out that the Harvard Gulch waterway has now deteriorated to a pitiful state of being a weed- choked, mosquito-infested mud hole. The same can be said of nearby DeBoer Park.

Year in and year out, the citizens of Denver are subjected to the tedious whine about revenue shortfalls, about fiscal challenges, about budgetary constraints, blah, blah, blah. Ever-present are the municipal professionals with beggar bowl in hand seeking ever more bond monies, ever more tax and fee initiatives ...

But is there ever a spoken word about a return on taxpayer investment? About increasing stakeholder value?

Our greatest enemy, it seems, is not corruption or crime. It is the bureaucratic apparatus that exalts and rewards its own haplessness.

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

Pearl Street Biz Has Its Underbelly

Dear Editor:

Being a neighbor who lives in Platt Park (11 years), it has been interesting to witness the up-and-down growth of our  neighborhood. Something that goes unnoticed is the unconditional growth of Pearl Street and how the elected officials justify the business growth at the expense of the lifestyle of the people who live here. Last weekend, with the Rock and Roll festival in full swing (serving drinks from noon-10p.m.) – we witnessed two adults leaving the activities using our front lawn as a toilet – one was peeing (woman) and the other was not! (drunken man) – the man fell on his own sh*t ... and damaged bushes and flowers in my front yard.

Another subject is the use of the parking lot at Grant Middle School as a place for employees to park so that the new businesses will have parking for more customers. Of course this sounds like a great idea until, at midnight or later the employees are talking about their evenings, enjoying an after-hour smoke, starting up cars and motorcycles AND disturbing the neighbors’ sleep. The problem is not the parking – it is our elected officials agreeing to allow too many restaurants on Pearl Street because of the income from taxes – and helping the developers and owners of these businesses who don’t live in the neighborhood.

Not sure how the process works or whether the people who live in the neighborhood are being justly represented with our needs in mind. I have called (City Councilman) Chris Nevitt with my concerns, but he only has a few days a month where he is prepared to discuss these issues in his office. The local business organization offered to pay for clean-up of my yard ($100) and actually advised me to call my city councilman.

It is my belief that there is nothing that I can do about this unconditional growth – for money, without any regard for my lifestyle in my neighborhood – thought you should know!

Randy Condit

 

Objects To Walmart At 9th & Colorado

Councilwoman Robb &  Councilwoman Susman:

I am writing to you in response to the recent article regarding the proposed addition of a Walmart as an anchor retailer at the old medical center location on Colorado Blvd. I want to express my concern about the proposal and about the differences in your response to it. I appreciate Councilwoman Susman’s insight into the public financing issue and the fact that the Denver City Council would play a role in approving that, even if the Council does not play a role in the building/zoning as Councilwoman Robb points out has already been approved.

I hope that you will each take very seriously the fact that so many of us in and near the neighborhood object to a Walmart. Whether the objections are motivated by social concerns, politics or aesthetics, as our representatives on the Council we rely on you to represent what is in the best interests of our community and citizens. Walmart has consistently proven to be a poor community member; pushing out smaller local businesses; increasing crime and vagrancy; depressing property values; and providing primarily low-wage jobs without benefits.

While I am eager to see the space in use, generating tax revenue, freeing the University from the financial burden of maintaining it and creating a more vibrant environment than currently exists, Walmart will provide only economic relief to the medical center with no other clear benefits. Please stand firm and represent the overwhelming objection to this proposal by your constituents with at least as much conviction as any one specific financial interest that may be weighing on you.

Thank you,

Josh Weiss & Margaret Jungmann

 


 

 
< Prev   Next >